Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Resilience Enhancement for Animal Breeding Programs

Gaurav Singh

Abstract


Resilience is an animal's ability to be unaffected by disturbances or to quickly reverts to the condition it was in prior to the interruption. Furthermore, generic markers for response to various environmental disruptions are still to be developed, and so resilience may not yet be included within the breeding strategies. New resilience indicators based on data obtained have been implemented as a result of recent improvements in big data collection, that can aid in the incorporation of resilience into animal breeding strategies. Resilience can be quantified over time response to variations from predicted productivities. The dispersion of variations, autocorrelation of deviance, skewnee. Two scenarios were presented to demonstrate the value of incorporating resilience into breeding plans of deviations, and the slope of a reaction norm could all be useful resilience measures. These (new) resiliency indicators allow breeding strategies to incorporate resiliency. Reduced labour and therapy costs can be used to compute the economic advantages of resilience indicators with in selection index. Several examples shown that improving resilience only with productivity features mostly in selection index is difficult, but that integrating resilience indicators in the selecting index can significantly enhance resilience. Modern improvements in huge data collecting and new phenotypic depending on this data provide intriguing potential to breed for increased livestock resilience.

 


Keywords


Resilience, Enhancement, Animal Breeding, Programs, Strategies, disturbances

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carabaño, M. J., Ramón, M., Díaz, C., Molina, A., Pérez-Guzmán, M. D., and Serradilla, J. M. (2017). BREEDING AND GENETICS SYMPOSIUM: Breeding for resilience to heat stress effects in dairy ruminants. A comprehensive review. J. Anim. Sci. 95, 1813–1826.

Codrea, M. C., Højsgaard, S., and Friggens, N. C. (2011). Differential smoothing of time-series measurements to identify disturbances in performance and quantify animal response characteristics: an example using milk yield profiles in dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 89, 3089–3098.

Colditz, I. G., and Hine, B. C. (2016). Resilience in farm animals: biology, management, breeding and implications for animal welfare. Anim. Prod. Sci. 56, 1961–1983.

Daetwyler, H. D., Villanueva, B., and Woolliams, J. A. (2008). Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS ONE 3: e3395.

Damgaard, L. H., Rydhmer, L., Løvendahl, P., and Grandinson, K. (2003). Genetic parameters for within-litter variation in piglet birth weight and change in within-litter variation during suckling. J. Anim. Sci. 81, 604–610.

De Jong, G., and Bijma, P. (2002). Selection and phenotypic plasticity in evolutionary biology and animal breeding. Livest. Sci. 78, 195–214.

Debat, V., and David, P. (2001). Mapping phenotypes: canalization, plasticity and developmental stability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 555–561.

Dekkers, J. C. M. (2007). Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124, 331–341.

Doeschl-Wilson, A. B., Villanueva, B., and Kyriazakis, I. (2012). The first step toward genetic selection for host tolerance to infectious pathogens: obtaining the tolerance phenotype through group estimates. Front. Genet. 3:265.

Elgersma, G. G., De Jong, G., Van der Linde, R., and Mulder, H. A. (2018). Fluctuations in milk yield are heritable and can be used as a resilience indicator to breed healthy cows. J. Dairy. Sci. 101, 1240–1250.

Falconer, D. S., and Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics (fourth edition). Harlow: Longman Group Ltd.

Finlay, K. W., and Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14, 742–754.

Flatt, T. (2005). The evolutionary genetics of canalization. Q. Rev. Biol. 80, 287–316.

Ge, L., Anten, N. P. R., Van Dixhoorn, I. D. E., Feindt, P. H., Kramer, K., Leemans, R., et al. (2016). Why we need resilience thinking to meet societal challenges in bio-based production systems. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 23, 17–27.

Gijzel, S. M. W., Van de Leemput, I. A., Scheffer, M., Roppolo, M., Olde Rikkert, M. G. M., and Melis, R. J. F. (2017). Dynamical resilience indicators in time series of self-rated health correspond to frailty levels in older adults. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 72, 991–996.

Grimsrud, K. M., Nielsen, H. M., Navrud, S., and Olesen, I. (2013). Households' willingness-to-pay for improved fish welfare in breeding programs for farmed Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 372, 19–27.

Hazel, L. N. (1943). The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28, 476–490.

Herrero-Medrano, J. M., Mathur, P. K., Ten Napel, J., Rashidi, H., Alexandri, P., Knol, E. F., et al. (2015). Estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values across challenged environments to select for robust pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 93, 1494–1502.

Hill, W. G., and Mulder, H. A. (2010). Genetic analysis of environmental variation. Genet. Res. (Camb.) 92, 381–395.

Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 4, 1–23.

Ibáñez-Escriche, N., Varona, L., Sorensen, D., and Noguera, J. L. (2008). A study of heterogeneity of environmental variance for slaughter weight in pigs. Animal 2, 19–26

Iung, L. H. S., Neves, H. H. R., Mulder, H. A., and Carvalheiro, R. (2017). Genetic control of residual variance of yearling weight in Nellore beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 95, 1425–1433




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijaba.v8i1.770

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.