Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Competitiveness of Indian agriculture: A case study of cotton crop

Rohit Narayan Patil, Saurab Gangaram Patil

Abstract


The future of the Indian agriculture and cotton industries is something that all worldwide stakeholders are interested in learning about, particularly in light of the recent introduction of cutting-edge technologies. This article examines senior Indian cotton in detail, focusing on the effect on BT cotton in the basket of Indian cotton.

According to empirical data, cotton acreage and productivity have a conflicting impact on cotton production in India throughout time. Additionally, it was discovered that BT and non-BT cotton adoption in broader domains will maintain cotton productivity while reducing the amount of cotton being cultivated. In 2009–2010, there was a significant increase in the use of insecticides for sucking, which coincided with the adoption rate of BT cotton. In contrast, the use of pesticides for boll warming was first reported in 2005–2006. The country's increase in cotton production following the introduction of BT cotton is not largely attributable to GM technology alone; other factors include expanding the area under cotton, particularly in irrigation areas, having a low paste incidence, evenly distributed rainfall, and higher market prices.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anonymous (2013) States of Indian Agriculture 2012-13, Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi, 2013. Carl E.

(2011) - Impact of Bt Cotton, the Potential Future Benefits from Biotechnology in China and India, in Frontiers of Globalization: Genetically Modified Food and Global Welfare, edited by G. Moschini. C. Carter and I. Sheldon. Emerald Books, 2011.

Daniel.a.Sumner (2006), “Effects of U.S. Upland Cotton Subsidies on Upland Cotton Prices and Quantities”Weblink http://www.africametrics.org/document

s/conference07/Day%203/Session%20

/

TRAORE%20The%20Impact%20of%2

United%20States%20Subsidies.pdf.

Shavit O, Dafni A, Ne'eman G. Competition between honeybees (Apis mellifera) and native solitary bees in the Mediterranean region of Israel—Implications for conservation. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences. 2009 Jan 1;57(3):171-83.

Letnic M, Koch F, Gordon C, Crowther MS, Dickman CR. Keystone effects of an alien top-predator stem extinctions of native mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009 Sep 22;276(1671):3249-56.

Forman C, Ghose A, Goldfarb A. Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management science. 2009 Jan;55(1):47-57.

Reardon T, Barrett CB, Berdegué JA, Swinnen JF. Agrifood industry transformation and small farmers in developing countries. World development. 2009 Nov 1;37(11):1717-27.

Sharma A, Sutradhar M, Monlai S, Kumari N. Present and past status of indian agriculture. Journal of Progressive Agriculture. 2018;9(2):64-79.

Brooks DH, Hummels D. Infrastructure? s Role in Lowering Asia? s Trade Costs: Building for Trade. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2009 Jan 30.

Othman P, Sungkar I, Hussin WS. Malaysia as an international halal food hub: competitiveness and potential of meat-based industries. ASEAN Economic Bulletin. 2009 Dec 1:306-20.

Funk CC, Brown ME. Declining global per capita agricultural production and warming oceans threaten food security. Food Security. 2009 Sep;1:271-89.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijpb.v9i1.856

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.