Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Biochemical and Technological Facet about Different Quality of Snacks Sold in Market

Chikanshi Sharma

Abstract


Background: In the last five years, revenue from the Indian savory snacks market has increased significantly to reach Rs. 6 billion (US$ 123.5 million), more than twice its size previously. However, per capita consumption remains very small, as the un-packaged snacks sector is considerably cheaper. Method: For the purpose of carrying out survey on the quality of snacks sold in market protein estimation by Kjeldahl method, Determination of moisture content, protein content, fat/oil estimation and sensory evaluation test were done. The grinding of the sample was performed before carrying out the chemical analysis. Different brands of two types of snack foods chips/wafers and biscuits were selected, and various tests were performed to check their quality because these types of packed food are commonly consumed by the masses. Result: The observed values of protein content of all the samples were found to be almost same as the protein content values given on the labels. The moisture content of chips and biscuits is very low in order that they will have a crisp eating quality. The sensory evaluation of the different samples was carried out by a panel of 3 members. The parameters for which the evaluation was done were Color, Taste, Texture, Odor, Signs of microbial growth, Presence of foreign bodies and Condition of the package. The observed fat content values of the samples were found to be almost same as the printed values on the labels of the product. Conclusion: Standard moister, protein, fat and sensory evaluation contents of the packed foods were measured and compared.

Keywords: Snakes, Packed food, Protein Estimation, Moisture, Sensory, Fat.

Cite this Article: Chikanshi Sharma. Biochemical and Technological Facet About Different Quality of Snacks Sold in Market. International Journal of Biochemistry and Biomolecules. 2020;
6(3): 64–71p.



Keywords


Snacks, Packed food, Protein Estimation, Moisture, Sensory, Fat.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ranganna S. Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products. Tata: McGraw-Hill Education; 1986. p. 1112 pages.

Kahiya ET, Forbes S, Balderstone C. An exploratory analysis of snack food purchasing behaviour in New Zealand. Looking Forward Looking Back Drawing Past Shape Future Mark. 2016:(57-65). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24184-5_14.

Popkin BM. The nutrition transition in low-income countries: an emerging crisis. Nutr Rev. 1994 Sep 1;52(9):285-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1994.tb01460.x, PMID 7984344.

Falguera V, Aliguer N, Falguera M. An integrated approach to current trends in food consumption: moving toward functional and organic products? Food Control. 2012;26(2):274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.01.051.

French SA, Jeffery RW, Story M, Breitlow KK, Baxter JS, Hannan P, Snyder MP. Pricing and promotion effects on low-fat vending snack purchases: the chips study. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(1):112-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.112, PMID 11189801.

Macdiarmid J, Loe J, Craig LC, Masson LF, Holmes B, McNeill G. Meal and snacking patterns of school-aged children in Scotland. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(11):1297-304. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.87, PMID 19707230.

Gupta V, Downs SM, Ghosh-Jerath S, Lock K, Singh A. Unhealthy fat in street and snack foods in low-socioeconomic settings in India: a case study of the food environments of rural villages and an urban slum. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016 Apr 1;48(4):269-79.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.11.006, PMID 26872553.

Wegener J, Raine KD, Hanning RM. Insights into the government’s role in food system policy making: improving access to healthy, local food alongside other priorities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Nov;9(11):4103-21. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9114103, PMID 23202834.

Vemula SR, Gavaravarapu SM, Mendu VV, Mathur P, Avula L. Use of food label information by urban consumers in India–a study among supermarket shoppers. Public Health Nutr. 2014 Sep;17(9):2104-14. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013002231, PMID 23965761.

Subba Rao GM, Sudershan RV, Rao P et al. Focus group studies on food safety knowledge, perceptions, and practices of school-going adolescent girls in south India. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009;41:341-6.

Gopalan C, Sastri BVR, Balasubramanian SC. Nutritive value of Indian foods; 1971.

Wardle J, Haase AM, Steptoe A, Nillapun M, Jonwutiwes K, Bellisle F. Gender differences in food choice: the contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Ann Behav Med. 2004;27(2):107-16. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_5, PMID 15053018.

Census of India (2011) Literates and literacy rates. In:. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Census of India–2011: primary census data highlights. New Delhi: registrar general and Census Commissioner. Available from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/PCA/PCA_Highlights/pca_highlights_file/India/Chapter-3.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Annual report on working of prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 for the year 2002. New Delhi: Government of India, MOHFW; 2004.

Vijaykumar S, Lwin MO, Chao J, Au C. Determinants of food label use among supermarket shoppers: a Singaporean perspective. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013;45(3):204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2012.09.001, PMID 23453423.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.