Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Biogeometric Model for the Magnification of the Mechanism of Enzyme Catalyzed Reaction through the Utilization of Principles of Nine-Point Circle for the Triangular Form of Lineweaver-Burk Plot in Biochemistry

Vitthalrao Bhimasha Khyade, Alec John Jeffreys

Abstract


The bio-geometrical model is dealing with correlation between the “five events for enzyme catalyzed reaction” and “triple point event serving groups on the circle” in triangular form of Lineweaver-Burk plot for magnification of the mechanism of enzyme catalyzed reaction. This model is based on the five point circle in the triangular form of Lineweaver-Burk plot for enzyme kinetics. The five significant points resulted for the circle with x–and y–-coordinates include: B [1, (1 ÷ Vmax)]; D [(1 ÷ 2), (Km + 2) ÷ (2 Vmax)]; E [1, (Km+2) ÷ 2Vmax)]; F [(1 ÷ 2), (1 ÷ Vmax)] and the point “G”. The x-coordinate of the point “G” corresponds to: [(Vmax2) ÷ (Vmax2 +Km2] and the y-coordinate of the point “G” corresponds to: [Km (Vmax2 +Km) + Vmax2] ÷ [(Vmax2 + Km2) Vmax]. The x-coordinate and y-coordinate for the point “O” representing center of circle in the attempt corresponds to: [(3 ÷ 4)] and [(Km+4) ÷ (4Vmax)] respectively. The bio-geometrical model considers representation of the significant interaction between the enzyme and substrate for the successful release of product through the each and every point on the five point circle in the triangular form of Lineweaver-Burk plot for enzyme kinetics. The controlling role of the point, “O”, center of circle in each and every event of the biochemical reaction is obligatory. The model is allotting specific role for the significant events in the biochemical reaction catalyzed by the enzymes. The process of biochemical catalysis through the enzymes is supposed to be completed through five events, which may be named as, “Bio-geometrical events of enzyme catalyzed reaction”. These five events for enzyme catalyzed reaction include: (1) Initial event of interaction of enzyme and substrate; (2) The event of the first transition state for the formation of enzyme-substrate complex; (3) The event of the second transition state for the formation of enzyme-product complex; (4) The event of release of the product and relieve enzyme and (5) The event of directing the enzyme to continue the reaction. The model utilizes the “triple point serving group on the circle” for the success of each and every event in the biochemical reaction. Thus, there is involvement of the three points including the point “O” for each event in the enzyme catalyzed reaction. The group of points serving for carrying out the event may be classified into five conic sections like: B-O-E; E-O-G; G-O-D; D-O-F and F-O-B. The bio-geometrical model is correlation between the “five events for enzyme catalyzed reaction” and “triple point event serving groups on the circle” in triangular form of Lineweaver-Burk plot for magnification of the mechanism of enzyme catalyzed reaction.

 

Keywords: Triangular form, Double reciprocal plot, Five point circle, Substrate, enzyme.

Cite this Article: Vitthalrao Bhimasha Khyade, Alec John Jeffreys. Biogeometric Model for the Magnification of the Mechanism of Enzyme Catalyzed Reaction through the Utilization of Principles of Nine-Point Circle for the Triangular Form of Lineweaver-Burk Plot in Biochemistry. International Journal of Biochemistry and Biomolecules. 2020; 6(2): 1–23p.


Keywords


Triangular form, double reciprocal plot, five-point circle, substrate, enzyme

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kraut Daniel A, Carroll Kate S, Herschlag Daniel. Challenges in enzyme mechanism and energetics. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;72:517–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem. 72. PMID 121801. 161617.

Michaelis L. Contribution to the theory of permeability of membranes for electrolytes. J Gen Physiol. 1925;8(2):33–59. doi: 10.1085/jgp.8.2.33, PMCID 2140746. PMID 19872189.

Menten ML. A Study of the oxidase Reaction with alpha-naphthol and Paraphenylenediamine. J Med Res. 1919;40(3):433–458.3. PMCID 2104435. PMID 19972493.

Michaelis L, Menten M. Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. Biochem Z. 1913;49:333–69.

Walker DH, Thorne PJ, Sinclair FL, Thapa B, Wood CD, Subba DB. A systems approach to comparing indigenous and scientific knowledge: consistency and discriminatory power of indigenous and laboratory assessment of the nutritive value of tree fodder. Agric Syst. 1999;62(2):87–103. doi: 10.1016/S0308–521X(99)00058-X.

Khyade VB. Influence of juvenoids on silkworm, Bombyx mori (L.) [Ph.D. thesis]. Kolhapur, India: Shivaji University; 2004.

Savizi B. Applicable problems in the history of mathematics: practical examples for the classroom. Math Appl. 2007;26(1):45–50. doi: 10.1093/teamat/hrl009.

Bajpai P. Application of enzymes in the pulp and paper industry. Biotechnol Prog. March 1999;15(2):147–57. doi: 10.1021/bp990013k, PMID 10194388.

Lineweaver H, Burk D. The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J Am Chem Soc. 1934;56(3):658–66. doi: 10.1021/ja01318a036.

Hayakawa Kou, Guo Lei, Terentyeva Elena A, Li Xiao-Kang, Kimura Hiromitsu, Hirano Masahiko, Yoshikawa Kazuyuki, Nagamine Takeaki, Katsumata Noriyuki, Ogata Tsutomu, Tanaka Toshiaki. Determination of specific activities and kinetic constants of biotinidase and lipoamidase in LEW rat and Lactobacillus casei (Shirota). J Chromatogr B. 2006;844(2):240–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.07.006, PMID 16876490.

Greco WR, Hakala MT. Evaluation of methods for estimating the dissociation constant of tight binding enzyme inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 1979;254(23):12104–9. doi: 10.1016/S0021–9258(19)86435–9, PMID 500698.

Dowd John E, Riggs Douglas S. A comparison of estimates of Michaelis–Menten kinetic constants from various linear transformations (pdf). J Biol Chem. 1965;240(2):863–9. doi: 10.1016/S0021–9258(17)45254–9.

Ochs Raymond S. The problem with double reciprocal plots. Curr Enzyme Inhib. 2010;6(3):2010DOI. doi: 10.2174/157340810793384098

Fraivert David. New applications of method of complex numbers in the geometry of cyclic quidrilaterals. Int J Geom. 2018, No. 1;7:4–16.

Coolidge JL. The heroic age of geometry. Proc Edinb Math Soc. 1929;1;11 (1892):18. t Gergonne's Annales de Mathématiques,, P. 215. Macaulay, History of the nine-point circle.

Ratcliffe Barrie M, Chapter 3. Towards a better understanding of Olinde Rodriguez and his circle: family and faith in his life and career. In: Altmann S, Ortiz EL, editors, Mathematics and social utopias in France: Olinde Rodrigues and his times, history of mathematics, 28. American Mathematical Society; 2006. p. 39–70.

Casey John. Nine-point circle theorem. In: A sequel to the first six books of Euclid. 4th ed. London: Longmans, Green, & Co.; 1886. p. 58.

Kocik Jerzy, Solecki Andrzej. Disentangling a triangle. Am Math Mon. 2009;116(3):228–37. doi: 10.1080/00029890.2009.11920932 and Solecki. (Sharers of a 2010 Lester R. Ford Award) give a proof of the nine-Point Circle Theorem.

Altshiller-Court Nathan. College geometry: an introduction to the modern geometry of the triangle and the circle. 2nd ed. New York: Barnes & Noble, LCCN 52013504; 1925.

Elizabeth G. Bremigan; ralph J. Bremigan; John D. Lorch. Math Second Sch Teach MAA. 2011.

Johnson RA. Modern geometry: an elementary treatise on the geometry of the triangle and the circle. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1929. p. 173–6, 249–50 and 268–9.

Wells D. The penguin dictionary of curious and interesting geometry. London: Penguin; 1991. p. 150.

Khyade Vitthalrao Bhimasha, Hershko Avram, Dongare Seema Karna. Euler’s line for enzyme kinetics. Int J Recent Acad Res. 2019;01(09):532–42.

Mitchell Douglas W. 89.80 A Heron-type formula for the reciprocal area of a triangle. Math Gaz. 2005;89(516):494. doi: 10.1017/S0025557200178532.

Dorin Andrica and Dan S ̧ tefan Marinescu. New Interpolation Inequalities to Euler’s R ≥ 2r. Forum Geometricorum. Vol. 17; 2017. p. 149–56.

Bell Amy. Hansen’s right triangle theorem, its converse and a generalization. Available from: http://forumgeom.fau.edu/FG2006volume6/FG200639.pdf. Forum Geometricorum Volume 6; 2006. p. 335–42.

Abu-Saymehand S, Hajja M. In search for more triangle centres-a source of classroom projects in Euclidean geometry. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2005;36:889–912.

Hajja, M., Martini, H. Concurrency of the altitudes of a triangle. Math Semesterber 60, 249–260 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00591-013-0123-z https://link.springer.com/

article/10.1007/s00591-013-0123-z#citeas

Kocik Jerzy, Solecki Andrzej. Disentangling a triangle. Am Math Mon. 2009;116(3):228–37. doi: 10.1080/00029890.2009.11920932 and Solecki. (Sharers of a 2010 Lester R. Ford Award) give a proof of the nine-Point Circle Theorem.

Posamentier Alfred S, Lehmann Ingmar. The secrets of triangles. Prometheus Books; 2012. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine-point_circle.

Koshland DE. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1958;44(2):98–104. doi: 10.1073/pnas.44.2.98, PMID 16590179.

Koshland DE, Jr. A model regulatory system: bacterial chemotaxis. Physiol Rev. 1979;59(4):811–62. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1979.59.4.811, PMID 386396.

Koshland DE, Jr., Goldbeter A, Stock JB. Amplification and adaptation in regulatory and sensory systems. Science. 1982;217(4556):220–5. doi: 10.1126/science.7089556, PMID 7089556.

Danylova TV, S, Komisarenko V. Scientific investigations of the Nobel prize winner Emil Fischer as a launching pad for the development of biochemistry: a brief overview. UkrBiochemJ. 2018;90(4, Jul–Aug):135–42. doi: 10.15407/ubj90.04.135.

Tarté R. Ingredients in meat products properties, functionality and applications. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 177.

Chymosin–GMO Database. GMO compass. European Union. July 10, 2010. Archived from the original on 26 March 2015. [retrieved Mar 1 2015].

Molimard P, Spinnler HE. Review: compounds involved in the flavor of surface mold-ripened cheeses: origins and properties. J Dairy Sci. February 1996;79(2):169–84. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022–0302(96)76348–8.

Guzmán-Maldonado H, Paredes-López O. Amylolytic enzymes and products derived from starch: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. September 1995;35(5):373–403. doi: 10.1080/10408399509527706, PMID 8573280.

Protease–GMO Database. GMO compass. European Union. July 10 2010. Archived from the original on 24 February 2015. [retrieved Feb 28 2015].

Alkorta I, Garbisu C, Llama MJ, Serra JL. Industrial applications of pectic enzymes: a review. Process Biochem. January 1998;33(1):21–8. doi: 10.1016/S0032–9592(97)00046–0.

Bajpai P. Application of enzymes in the pulp and paper industry. Biotechnol Prog. March 1999;15(2):147–57. doi: 10.1021/bp990013k, PMID 10194388.

Begley CG, Paragina S, Sporn A. An analysis of contact lens enzyme cleaners. J Am Optom Assoc. March 1990;61(3):190–4. PMID 2186082.

Farris PL. Economic growth and organization of the U.S. Starch industry. In: BeMiller JN, Whistler RL, editors. Starch chemistry and technology. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 2009.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.